Idaho Republicans are planning to introduce a party registration system for voters in primary elections. The proposed legislation comes after a federal judge sided with Republicans in ruling that Idaho’s open primary election system violates their constitutional right to freely assemble.

Republicans could introduce the new party registration and closed primary format in the next week, according to Secretary of State Ben Ysursa, who was on the losing end of the court ruling. Ysursa also said he wasn’t surprised by the court decision.

The court ruling struck down Idaho’s open primary system, in which voters don’t register with a party, but can only cast primary ballots for candidates in one party. The state GOP wants to switch to a closed primary, in which voters would need to register as Republicans to vote for Republican primary candidates.

According to the Center for Voting and Democracy, 26 states have closed primaries, 15 have open primaries, with the rest of the U.S. states have a combination of the two or a different primary election system.

“The current primary system in Idaho imposes a severe burden on the Idaho Republican Party’s First Amendment rights,” U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill wrote in a decision Wednesday. “Accordingly, this Court must deem the current Idaho primary system unconstitutional.”

Winmill ruled that changing Idaho’s primary system could add costs to Idaho’s elections and prevent people from keeping their party affiliation private, but that those issues aren’t compelling enough to burden the state GOP’s rights.

Idaho Republican Party Executive Director Jonathan Parker said he’s been working on legislation for closed primaries, and wants to get legislative leaders, Ysursa and Gov. Butch Otter on board to get the plan in place. He said the goal is to approve a closed primary plan this legislative session so that it would be in place for the May 2012 primary elections.

Without a new primary plan, Parker said that the GOP precinct chairs could decide which legislative candidates would appear on the general election ballot next November, since Winmill ruled the current system is unconstitutional.

Winmill wrote that experts brought in by Ysursa, college professors Andrew Martin of Washington University in St. Louis and Kyle Saunders of Colorado State University, showed that Idaho’s open primary system leads to crossover voting, when someone who sides with one party votes in another party’s primary, which could harm the Idaho GOP.

“Especially in a one-party state like Idaho where the Republican Party primaries are in most cases the ‘only game in town,’ voters do likely cross over; they have to in order to have any meaningful influence in elections,” Martin and Saunders wrote.

The college professors also wrote that closed primaries could lead to more ideologically extreme candidates, but Winmill said that falls within the GOP’s rights. “Choosing ideologically extreme candidates is precisely what a political party is entitled to do in asserting its right of association under the First Amendment,” Winmill wrote.

Ysursa, who said he favors the current open primary system, said he has practical concerns about switching to closed primaries. “You can say that you want party registration, but there’s over 700,000 voters right now who aren’t registered,” Ysursa said.

Ysursa has won three elections as a Republican for his job as secretary of state. He said that the state party, which sued his office to change the state primary law, still supports him, and that Idaho Republicans have done well with the open primary system.

“I don’t believe the Republican Party has suffered — our election success is pretty remarkable,” Ysursa said. “We disagree on that issue, but the bottom line is to win elections.”

The full details of the closed primary plan aren’t available, but it could let parties decide whether to let independent voters cast a ballot in a primary election. A recent survey by Boise State University found that 37 percent of respondents identified themselves as independents, which was higher than self-identified Republicans or Democrats.

Idaho Democratic Party Executive Director Shelley Landry said the party’s main concern is making sure people can vote. “Whether the voter is a Democrat, Republican or Independent, we want to ensure they they get the right to participate,” Landry told by e-mail.

College of Idaho political economy professor Jasper LiCalzi said many Idahoans consider themselves independents, even if they typically side with one party. He said those voters wouldn’t want to be shut out of primary elections. “That’s not going to be all that popular,” LiCalzi said.

LiCalzi agreed with the other college professors that closed primaries could lead to more ideologically extreme candidates. He said party registration roles, which would be public, could help candidates campaign. “It makes it easier for the politicians when it comes to elections,” he said, since candidates could target their mailing or door knocking to members of one party.

Join the discussion


About The Author


  1. Why should a party or its members pay for a process where the other party can have a big say in the selection of a candidate. It is like a union letting non union community members vote for their leadership, something I doubt the left would support.

  2. I’m okay with this, now make each party pay for their own primary and/or caucus.

  3. Party politics at its worst. This is nothing more than a twisted form (or precursor) to the gerrymandering that will take place as a result of the 2010 census. The beauty of the open primary system is that it gives the People, where all things start, the ability to identify who they believe is the most qualified candidate and get them through the primary regardless of which party they belong to.
    I find the idea that a political party can claim the right to peaceably assemble by closing their membership patently offensive. The People have that right, not any organization. The inherent rights of the people include free association and unencumbered suffrage. Closing the primary violates the right of the people to free association by requiring fealty to a particular party in order to exercise their right to suffrage.

  4. Pure silliness on the part of a political party, this time the Republicans. Idaho is already over whelmingly Republican. There is no point in forcing people to join one party or the other to vote in the primary. If they don’t come up with a way for independents to vote in the primary they will be further disenfranchising a sizable number of voters. I will not register in one or another party, and will not be voting in the primary if that is what is required. It will be the first time in well over 40 years I have not voted in a federal, state, or local election.

  5. The Repubs shot themselves in the foot on this one. I am an independent that used to vote with them because I leaned more to the right than the left.

    Now the Repubs have pushed me away, and won’t get my vote at all. I cannot vote for a Dem, but won’t for a Repub either.

    I guess we need to find out how to start an Indie primary.

  6. […] Court ruling pushes Idaho toward party registration primaries « […]

  7. […] legislation for closed primaries follows a successful lawsuit by the Idaho Republican Party, which convinced a federal judge that Idaho’s open primaries, which let voters pick any […]

  8. […] legislation follows a federal court ruling earlier this month that struck down the state’s open primary system, in which voters don’t register by […]

  9. […] Hill, R-Rexburg. “It’s a constitutional primary bill.” The new primary system follows a successful lawsuit by the Idaho Republican Party striking down Idaho’s existing open primary election […]

  10. Perhaps there ought to be registration of Independents as well, so they could vote in THEIR primary elections…or any other party that’s inside the State of Idaho.

    After all, the primary elections ARE specific to parties.

    We hailed from States that have closed primaries, and find that not exclusive. It doesn’t prevent any registered voter from voting in the General Elections. There can be provisions made for that to happen.

    Each party, no matter how many of them there are, would be choosing its OWN candidates; that’s what primaries are for, not to be choosing the other parties’ candidates.

  11. […] in 2011, the state Republican Party successfully sued for the right to close their primary elections. Over the past few days, much has been discussed about the candidates’ for Secretary of State in […]

Comments are closed.